478
469
7.
With reference to paragraphs 7, 8, and 9
of your Despatch, the recommendations of the Committee on
Education may I think be fairly stated as follows. For the
reasons stated in the last paragraph of their Report they
advocated that the limited pecuniary assistance which Govern-
ment is able to render should be devoted in much larger
measure to Anglo-Chinese than to Vernacular Schools. They re-
cognised that the existing Vernacular Schools could not be
disestablished. They proposed therefore to endeavour to improve
such of them as were capable of improvement and to utilise
them where possible as preparatory Schools for some of the
Anglo-Chinese Schools, but they apparently did not contemplate
assisting any new Vernacular Schools.
I agree in the view which you seem to hold that
Government assistance should not be withheld from Vernacular
Education, and after very careful consideration I am of opinion
that it will be better to keep the Vernacular Schools quite
distinct from the Anglo-Chinese Schools and not to provide
for the teaching of English in them. At the same time I
consider that every endeavour should be made to improve the
Vernacular Schools, especially in their method of teaching the
Chinese language. Chinese text-books by the use of which the
children may at the same time acquire some Western knowledge
should also be introduced in them.
The Committee have laid stress on the fact that it
is essential that students should have a good working knowledge
of their own language.
8.
The principle which should, therefore,
be laid down as those on which Educational work will be carried
ΟΥΣ
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.